AFASE at school Advocate For Appropriate Special Education
May 15, 2004
Hello Mr. McTeague,
I live in Pickering, Ontario and I have a 12 year-old son with autism. His name is Brandon. I also provide special education advocacy services to parents of children with autism in the Durham Region and the greater Toronto area.
This is in response to Senator Munson's Press Release and Speech given yesterday. I have attached the relevant paragraphs at the end of this e-mail. In addition to what Senator Munson has said, I would like to make you aware of the issues as I see it.
There are far too many preschool children with autism who are not getting the necessary treatment and programs such as the research-based, proven effective, Intensive Behaviour Intervention (IBI), based on the principles of Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA), in order to learn skills that normal children learn naturally...skills that they need to learn in order to function at home, in the community, in the classroom, and on the playground.
They are on waiting lists for the government funded IBI treatment. A treatment that most parents cannot afford to pay for themselves. Children need treatment as soon as they are diagnosed, they can't afford to wait...society can't afford for them to wait.
To add insult to injury, most of the children on the waiting list will NEVER receive treatment because after age 5 they are no longer eligible for the government funded treatment, regardless of their needs.
If a parent decides to register the child in the public school system while they are waiting, at great risk to their child's development, and miraculously they are granted funding, the parent must then withdraw the child from school so that the IBI instructor can teach the child in a way that he can learn. School boards do not allow IBI instructors to teach the child at school.
If children with autism were allowed to successfully graduate from their IBI program by allowing a well designed transition plan into their grade one curriculum, they WOULD be successful at school and would eventually no longer require a special education program that includes IBI.
School administrators refuse to discuss IBI as an instructional accommodation regardless of whether psychologists have deemed it to be a necessary intervention for the child, consequently they are denying children the right to instructional accommodations to meet their needs during school hours.
In Ontario, the government has hired Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) consultants to provide strategies to teachers and teaching assistants on a broad basis. Consultative support models have been found to be ineffective by the courts. It has been determined that consultative supports do not allow children with autism to access education.
Research shows that the majority of children with autism, receiving the generic services that are currently provided by our public education system, will continue to need special education programs throughout their public education and continue to need government support as adults, at an enormous cost to tax payers.
If children with autism received direct instruction from an IBI instructor for at least 25% of the instructional time, it would be comparable to the specialized support and accommodation that is provided to a child who is deaf or blind. If school boards can provide specialized support and accommodations for children who are deaf or blind, why can't they provide the same for children with autism?
By denying the instructional accommodations that children with autism need at school, school boards have violated the Human Rights Code, the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, and the Education Act.
Please contact me by e-mail or phone to discuss the issues as they relate to the Federal Government's policies to improve waiting lists and accessibility for children with autism who need IBI treatment at home as well as in the public school environment. Thank you for listening. Karen Robinson AFASE at school www.afase.com karen.robinson@afase.com